Am I best able to learn through words, through my own logic, or do I need to make mental associations, use "maps" to view relationships to other facts? Do I learn best by doing it myself?
TRADITIONAL vs. NON-TRADITIONAL LEARNERS:
Traditional teaching methods are concrete, sequential, auditory, verbal, logical, and mathematical. A huge number of students, in fact, most young children, fall into other learning categories such as abstract, random, visual, kinesthetic, and global. It only makes good sense to adjust our teaching methods and materials to blend seamlessly with children's natural way of interacting with their world.
In our society in particular, we tend to consider certain types of learners as the smart ones, while the others might fall into the categories of "talented" or "good with his hands." In reality, there are many ways of being smart. In general, our achievement tests measure and celebrate those children who are in the first group described above. Tests cannot show the incredible intelligence of those children who learn, remember, and are smart in other ways. For those children who cannot just memorize facts, symbols, equations, there is hope. Those children may utilize pictures they draw themselves, graphic organizers that make sense to them. It is a great practice to start with kindergarten children asking them, "How did you remember this?" or "How can we remember this word next time we see it?" "What does this look like to you?" "What does this make you think of?" All these questions will be priming the child's own brain to come up with associations he/she can use to learn and remember.
WHY STYLIZE THE SIGHT WORDS & ALPHABET?
It was precisely in this manner that our sight words were created. My students were not able to remember from one minute to the next a word they had "learned." They could laboriously decode anything, but reading was not fun. They were working so hard on decoding that they paid no attention to meaning at all. They thought their task was to decode (sound out words), so even though they could decode, they were really not reading.
In desperation one day in December, I showed the children the word "help" and asked them what it looked like to them. With very little hesitation, one very athletic, artistic boy said "It looks like two arms raised yelling HELP!" "Boing! A light flashed in my brain. I stylized that very first sight word. What followed was several weeks in which the children discussed with me what each sight word looked like to them. I worked after hours stylizing, and when I had finished, the children reviewed the words and let me know which ones simply did not work for them. Those I reworked.
This process started in December. By March/April, time for formal testing, all the children were reading at a minimum of 2nd grade. They were kindergarteners. They are all smart. They just needed to learn a different way....from whole to part, via visual and kinesthetic modalities.
BUT ... ISN'T THIS JUST A CRUTCH?
Some adults approach our stylized products and quickly back away. They feel the visuals form a crutch without which the children will flounder. Reality is that without the visual, many children will not quickly learn their sight words. Reality is that the visual is not an illustration without which the child will be lost. The visual is integrated solidly into the word so that when the child sees the plain word, the brain superimposes the visual, making for instant recall. The visual is the link to meaning; the hook that retrieves the word or letter.
The only thing to which I can liken this process is our brain's ability to imbue one little detail with remembered, associated sights, sounds, smells and emotions. How many of us see a word and suddenly are flooded with associated memories? The brain has an amazing associative capacity. Kinesthetic children who have learned a body motion with a sight word have only to see a plain word, recall the motion and as they start to do the motion, the word pops out of their mouth.
WHAT DOES RESEARCH SAY ABOUT MULTIPLE PATHWAYS TO THE BRAIN?
Research shows us that learning to read is a mostly left-brain function. For children who are not left brained, (left brained learners deal best with symbols, speech, words), but are instead visual learners and tactile learners (need hands-on), learning to read can be a great challenge. For these children, using a variety of pathways to the brain means they have the ability to learn to read in a way that suits their brains better! They actually experience a reshaping of their brains over time when they are taught from multiple directions simultaneously (such as phonemic awareness activities - hearing and manipulating sounds to make words - body movement to teach kinesthetic learners, hands-on tasks for tactile learners, visuals, rhythm, stories) leading to success for these children who might otherwise experience failure. What is wonderful about teaching young children this way is that when we combine left-brain elements such as symbols (letters and words in decodable text books) with visual and tactile elements such as we do in our materials, children are actually being offered a chance to learn in ways that engage BOTH sides of their brains. This practice allows them to develop a strong system for learning, which strengthens their ability to use the less-preferred hemisphere in subsequent learning.
Research shows that the elements of which we speak (visuals, motions, body movement, stories, activities that utilize both hemispheres of the brain simultaneously help with many children who struggle - from dyslexia, autism, aspergers, ADD, children with other "identified learning disabilities." For children with attention difficulties, using the visuals embedded in symbols allows their brain to record a quick snapshot of the word so that the visual is there to act as a hook for recall. I would like to share here a portion of an article by Laurie Wagner:
"Research confirms that effective, multisensory reading instruction literally remodels the brains of struggling readers. Multisensory learning incorporates a variety of learning channels during instruction, especially utilization of visual, auditory, tactile (touch) and kinesthetic (muscle movement) learning pathways. When struggling learners are taught to read using direct, explicit, systematic, multisensory phonics instruction, research using brain imaging shows us that the impact on the brain is significant!
Dr. Sally Shaywitz, a leader in the field of dyslexia and reading research, has conducted reading research at Yale University's Center for Learning and Attention. Observing brain imaging during the reading process through the use of functional MRIs explicitly shows that good readers consistently use specific portions of the left-brain, with brain activity highly-focused in very specific areas during reading tasks. Brain imaging in poor readers, on the other hand, shows diffused activity scattered throughout the brain; much less efficient for reading.
Furthermore, studies have shown that instruction using direct, explicit, systematic, multisensory phonics actually changes how these poor readers use the pathways in their brains for reading. This kind of instruction, including an early emphasis on phonemic awareness, taught two hours per week for a year, significantly enhances students' overall reading accuracy and fluency. The changes in brain imaging after this kind of intervention show a significant increase in the focused use of the left hemisphere of the brain during reading tasks. The brain activity of the poor readers appears more and more like the brain activity of the good readers! These formerly "poor readers" are developing reading systems in their brains that were not present before the instruction occurred.
Additional studies supporting these results have been conducted in many research facilities, including a team led by Associate Professor of Pediatrics Dr. Guinevere Eden at the General Clinical Research Center at Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, DC, and a study at the Medical College of Wisconsin, with Jeffrey R. Binder, MD, Professor of Neurology and Robert F. Newby, PhD, Associate Professor of Neurology.
Early identification and intervention in kindergarten and grade one using this research-based instruction can prevent many at-risk students from ever struggling with reading. This kind of proven and effective instruction for older students who already struggle with reading skills acquisition can reverse the on-going difficulties, changing those learners into more competent readers. For dyslexic, learning disabled and ADD individuals, these instructional methods give them specific strategies and skills to work with their learning differences, allowing them to become successful readers and spellers, significantly impacting their schoolwork and life-long success.
Excerpts from the article "School Support for Learning Disabled and ADD Learners"
By Laurie Wagner
Reading and Language Arts Centers
800-READ211 (800-732-3211)